And so it has come to this: The horse who won an insignificant stakes on an artificial surface at a minor racetrack in England has a reserved spot in the starting gate for the Kentucky Derby, and the horse who ran second in the Florida Derby may not even get a chance to race for the world’s most famous roses.
Yes, it’s stunningly, shockingly and even frighteningly absurd. Horse racing finds itself in a bizarre place of distortion and warped priorities, a place not unlike the Fun House at the Texas State Fair. Only it’s not fun.
Dunkirk gave an excellent performance while finishing second to Quality Road in Saturday’s Florida Derby at Gulfstream Park. On a speed-favoring, jazzed up surface, Dunkirk rallied from far back despite a wide trip around the second turn. His effort was nearly as impressive as the winner’s, and it emphatically insisted, not that there was much doubt about it, that he deserves to be included among the top 3-year-olds in the country. In other words, he’s just the sort of horse everybody wants to see in the Kentucky Derby.
But by my calculations, updated through Saturday, Dunkirk is tied for 21st in graded earnings among the Kentucky Derby possibilities. Only 19 spots are available in the starting gate, with preference based on earnings in graded stakes. And, of course, one spot is reserved for Mafaaz, the winner of the $115,000 Kentucky Derby Challenge Stakes at Kempton Park, a race that was created in an embarrassingly wrong-headed display of propitiation.
And so Mafaaz is in, and Dunkirk isn’t. Not yet anyway. Some with more earnings could pass on the Derby, moving him into the top 19, but with several lucrative stakes remaining, some with smaller bankrolls could soon surpass him. Imperial Council has $50,000 in graded earnings going into Saturday’s Wood Memorial at Aqueduct, and Charitable Man will take $150,000 into the Blue Grass. Dunkirk’s Derby status is very uncertain.
The silly Kempton Park race wasn’t one of Churchill Downs’ better ideas. But the entire process of restricting the field to 20 starters is flawed. First of all, it relinquishes authority to the American Graded Stakes Committee, allowing the committee, in effect, to determine who will or won’t start in the Kentucky Derby. Why would Churchill abnegate control of its showcase attraction, and why do so to a committee that consistently botches up its primary task of grading stakes?
Second, the process doesn’t distinguish in any way among the graded stakes. Dollars that a 2-year-old earns in the Grade III Bashford Manor at six furlongs count just as much as the money earned by a 3-year-old in the Grade I Wood Memorial at 1 1/8 miles. The Delta Jackpot, with its $750,000 purse, is just as important in terms of qualifying for the roseate run as the Florida Derby. In fact, the runner-up in the Delta Jackpot, West Side Bernie, is virtually certain to have a place the Derby lineup, unlike the runner-up in Florida.
And then there’s the problem of Dubai. Sheikh Mohammed has created a race, the $2 million UAE Derby, where his own horses can collect tickets to Kentucky. With his victory Saturday, Regal Ransom sits atop the graded earnings list with $1,250,000. The UAE runner-up, Desert Party, is fourth with $641,667.
Churchill should ask itself whether the Kentucky Derby is run for the graded stakes committee, the Europeans, the Sheikhs or the American racing fans. Whose Derby is it anyway?
Some will argue that Todd Pletcher could have run Dunkirk in another graded stakes or that he could still. Many of these same people argue that trainers should always do what’s best for their horses. Well, isn’t that precisely why Dunkirk is so lightly raced. He had some shin problems last year, Pletcher explained, and so didn’t race as a 2-year-old. Pletcher brought Dunkirk along slowly and incrementally. He did, in other words, what was best for the horse. Should the price of that be exclusion from the Derby?
The problem has no easy solution. Some will point out that the Kentucky Derby got along very nicely thank you for many years without limiting the field to 20. But in recent years, the Kentucky Derby has become so popular and such a monolithic objective in the minds of so many owners and trainers that there must be some process for limiting the field should more than 20 horses be entered.
And so here’s a suggestion, provided not so much by me as by recent history. Since 1980, the Blue Grass (114), Santa Anita Derby (96), Florida Derby (93), Arkansas Derby (81) and Wood Memorial (73) have produced the most Kentucky Derby starters. During that same period, the Louisiana Derby has produced two Kentucky Derby winners and more than 50 starters. Clearly, those are the most meaningful preparatory races for the Triple Crown.
Horses that finish first or second in any of those stakes should automatically have a place reserved for them in the starting gate for the Kentucky Derby. Beyond that, should more than 20 horses be entered, or pre-entered, a committee could rate the remaining horses by preference based on their accomplishments.
Yes, some would no doubt question the committee’s ratings. They will be only as good as the committee itself. But that’s where Churchill can regain control of the Derby to ensure it will be the best race possible for the sport’s fans: by appointing a committee of respected experts that won’t include the marketing genius who dreamed up the Kentucky Derby Challenge at Kempton Park.


Recent Comments